Delivering the Systems and Expertise You Need to Confidently Make Great Hiring Decisions
- Getting job descriptions right, part two - http://t.co/OjIP9vUr #hr #recruiting #management 2012-10-10
- If you love someone, let them go, gracefully. It matters - http://t.co/BIJ92ZGV #hr #management #leadership 2012-10-10
- RT @HireBetterCEO: Three reasons a hire doesn't work out - http://t.co/c040hWrQ #management 2012-10-10
- 5 questions to ask to see if your recruiting process really works - http://t.co/8qOuGPSc #hr #management #recruiting 2012-10-09
- More updates...
Blogs About Hiring
Blogs By Smart People
- Austin Entrepreneur Network
- Backpocket COO
- DRiVE by Dan Pink
- EOS Blog
- Growth Guy
- Results.com Execution
- The Rhetorical Journey
Tag CloudA-Player A-Players Austin Baseline Selling Brad Smart career history chris mursau Dave Kurlan EO Fame Family Fortune Fun generation Y geoff smart hire better hiring hiring manager Interview interview training job description Joe Navarro Kurlan Objective Management Group OtherInbox proactive recruiting recruit don't absorb Recruiting Reference Check Retention Scorecard smarttopgrading social networking talent acquisition Topgrading topgrading interview topgrading methodology TORC tweets Twitter unemployment unemployment rate verne harnish virtual bench who the book
At HireBetter, we’re always looking at our processes and results to try to identify trends and figure out better ways to help our clients confidently make great hiring decisions.
One of those trends that we’ve noticed has held true over the past 6 years of business has been the SOURCE of where candidates come from and then who our clients ultimately hire. Here are our findings:
If you have 100 Candidates* that you’re considering, our experience would suggest that:
- 82-87 will be Direct Applicants [defined as those who see your posting somewhere and send in their resume via email]
- 12-15 will come from a Headhunter or Recruiting Researcher
- 1-3 will be Referrals [defined as anyone who you learn about through your network or the network of those you trust]
*Author’s Note: the reason I’ve chosen 100 is because it makes the %’s really easy to calculate. If you have greater or fewer than 100, look at the total % of the pipeline instead of the # of people.
For the FINAL 3 People, we’ve found that it’s very likely the make-up of that pool looks like this:
- 1 Direct Applicant
- 1 From a Headhunter
- 1 Referral
And when you make your Ultimate Hiring Decision – you’re at least TWICE as likely to hire the Referral versus the other 2 candidates.
Granted, there are some obvious reasons why Hiring Managers choose the referrals. Things like the stigma that might be attached to an unemployed direct applicant or the costs associated with an external headhunter that might impact your Department’s P&L. But even with those things stated, I set out to find some more answers as to just WHY a referral is so much more likely to get hired than anyone else for open positions.
[JDavis] What’s the significance in your mind of earning that referral introduction that gets you an interview?
[TSinger] Hiring Mangaers are human beings – no matter how many pre-screening tests they can use, how much training they’ve had on the psychology of hiring. At the end of the day people are drawn to do business with people they know, like and trust. When someone they know, like and trust strongly encourages them to meet with someone it’s going to get preference because ultimately what a Hiring Manager is trying to do is eliminate people so that they can have a “short list”. Being a referral from someone that the hiring manager likes and trusts, means you’re going to have a much higher likelihood of landing on the short list. If that Hiring Manager knows somebody, likes somebody – that candidate gets to ride on the coattails of those human emotions and can benefit from their referee’s reputation.
One other thought here: I’ve said for years people will do biz with people they know, like and trust (this isn’t an original thought – it’s widely accepted). The problem is that in the last two years, the definition of the word “know” has changed. Because of the mass adoption of social media, we all think we “know” everyone else. This used to be a process [getting to know someone] that took years to develop. It’s served to make the act of “know” less important but makes LIKE and TRUST significantly more important. Just knowing “Of” someone doesn’t necessarily lead to like and trust. Today, referrals need to come from someone that the referee TRULY likes and trusts.
[JDavis] What are the dangers of being a referral if the person who is referring you just KNOWS you, and you’re not SURE that they LIKE and TRUST you?
[TSinger] Asking a stranger or an acquaintance to introdce you to their company is just slightly better than picking up an employee directory and calling through it. The risks are that (a) the referral might not happen [as the candidate you may think you got referred but it didn't happen] or (b) the referee could give a “lip service” referral that indicates that they don’t really support you or won’t stand up for you. The power of a REAL referral is that the person will stand up for you and can really make a strong case for why the hiring manager should hire that person.
If you’re a Hiring Manager and you receive a referral from someone, what should you look for in that referral to know it’s “real”
1. How do you know this person? (look for the fact that they really KNOW the person, not just know “of” them. Get to the bottom of the story by asking, “Do you just follow them on Twitter?” or do they actually use statements like, “I worked with them for three years and they’re a rock star“.
2. What does their work product look like? Do they have direct knowledge? How do they know them related to the job that you’re referring them for?
It gets back again to that danger I referenced in the first section of “just because you follow them on twitter or you’re connected on facebook, that doesn’t amount to a hill of beans.”
Ultimately, it’s got to be MORE THAN “Ambient Awareness”. As a Hiring Manager your goal is to be working with a stronger foundation of knowledge versus just a marketing brochure disguised as a resume.
While the tools we use to communicate over the past 2 decades have changed, how we’re wired as humans to make decisions is still the same. How people speak about others (yourself included) and your personal brand is just as important as it has ever been.
[JDavis] Why should an interviewer or hiring manager CARE about the size of someone’s network and influence or reputation?
[TSinger] As the world has gotten more digital and electronic, the ABILITY to connect with someone and to get others to stand up and say, “I like them, I trust them” is exponentially more valuable than in previous years. This ability has become “capital” – because people just don’t do it any more (or more importantly, do it well). There’s also so much more noise. When you’ve got people who stand up and say, “I REALLY KNOW John Doe – then you’ve got a winner.” When you see that someone has real human connections that care about them, it’s more valuable because it is genuine and says people care.
But there’s more to it than just being liked! Just because someone has a lot of visibility and people like them doesn’t mean they’re good at a job. But it’s my opinion that if you have two people whose ability is equal but one of those people has great interpersonal skills and a strong network of who will stand up for them, the tie MUST go to that person because it says that they are much more well-rounded.
Bottom Line: It’s not just about the network. You still have to be good. Being good at what you do is your “admission ticket”. Too many Professionals today subscribe to what I like to call the Kevin Costner Business Model: if you build it they will come. What I tell people is, “If you’re the best kept secret in your industry, you lose”. When it comes down to a hiring decision, with all things being equal, a Hiring Manager is going with the person who has the reputation.
Thom Singer is a Professional Speaker, Consultant and the Award-Winning Author of seven books on the power of networking and business relationships. He has trained thousands of people on the art of creating a personal and professional brand. Thom’s Blog, Some Assembly Required, is widely considered one of the top resources on or off-line for Professionals and Job Seekers and his Networking Quotient Test was created to help assess and then provide the action steps needed to make networking a priority. You can also follow him on Twitter.
Tags: A-Players, hire better, hiring manager, Job Search, proactive recruiting, recruit don't absorb, Recruiting, social networking, talent acquisition, thom singer, Topgrading, topgrading methodology, unemployment, using social networking tools to get a job
There are so many recent tools that people want to get us to use these days that I’ve decided to publish my list of predictions for 2009 and Social Networking.
1. Yes, Social Networking is here to stay. Not a shocker of a first prediction but when even my semi-retired 62 year old Uncle has a Facebook page for his Barbershop Quartet, it bodes well for more and more Internet users over the age of 40 embracing social tools and utilizing them for promoting themselves on the web to further their careers.
2. It doesn’t take enough money to build social applications for there to be any competitive advantage for newcomers other than a few lines of code. As a direct result, the biggest networks have or will raise enough investment money to give them time to find workable revenue models. The tiny social networks will find their niches and targeted advertising revenue will follow. It’s the medium-sized services, the latecomers to the Facebook era, that are going to fall by the wayside, being snapped up on the cheap by acquirors or simply going out of business.
3. Social Tools & Networks will have to find a way to earn money. There wasn’t really any significant money (let alone profit) earned by the biggest players in 2008. If these companies are focusing on Recruiting as an industry where they want to make in-roads they’re in for a rough year. While American Workforce has weathered storm comfortably, many of our competitors have made significant cut-backs. Corporations are also slashing their internal recruiting budgets and headcount. It’s not a good time to be selling in the recruiting space and we’ll see virtually all of the companies who tried to get our attention in 08 disappear in 09.
4. The Web 1.0 companies that have a loyal following will make the leap into the next evolution. Whether or not they’re successful will take a while to manifest itself but I expect to see the likes of Monster.com and others making significant changes that allow their users to do a better job of passive seeking. In fact, Monster just announced some significant changes that point them in this direction (I swear, I’ve had this blog post in the works for 3 weeks). According to them, nearly 90% of the consumer-side interface has gotten revamped.
Tags: 2.0, barbershop, cutting recruiters, earning profit, facebook, lay-offs, predictions for 09, recruiting budgets, recruiting trends for 2009, ruby on rails, social applications, social media, social networking, using social networking tools to get a job, weather the storm, web 2.0
In recent weeks we’ve seen the sheer number of resumes that arrive on a daily basis increase exponentially. Because the job market has continued to soften and analysts are predicting a potential increase in the Unemployment Rate to possibly as high as 9%, more and more job seekers are asking us, “What can I do to improve my chances of landing a new job?”
Tim Hayden, the Founder and CEO of GamePlan Marketing is both an advisor to American Workforce as well as a close friend. While at dinner with him last night we devoted a significant amount of the conversation to the topic of Social Media and Social Networking. There are so many people who are marketing themselves as “social media experts” and virtually all of them agree that they can’t agree on anything.
One aspect of social networking has become abundantly clear in the past months and years: it might help your ability to land that job but it can definitely destroy your chances if you’re not paying attention to your online reputation.
Jeremy Toeman wrote a tremendous Blog Entry a couple of weeks ago that I don’t think I could have written any better. Some snippets for those who want a short version:
*Comment (thoughtfully – don’t just suck up) on a recent blog post. No need to leave a comment on all the blog posts, but one or two is a good move.
*Send a Tweet to the company’s twitter account (or individual’s) before/after your interview. There’s no “rule” to the content, but a cleverly handled message can be impactful.
*Don’t “friend” someone. It’s perfectly fine to add anyone you meet as a LinkedIn contact, but unless you know, for sure, that someone treats Facebook “friends” as a list of anyone/everyone they’ve ever encountered, don’t cross this potentially bad line.
*If you felt the guy/gal you interviewed with was “a total tool”, that’s just fine, and you can tell your buddies in person and out loud, as opposed to in writing. Emails have a way of getting forwarded.
Also, based on our experiences at American Workforce, here are a couple of other added bonus items you can look into:
1. Follow influential people who are tweeting about the industry that you’re in. Being able to carry on conversations about lots of topics because you’re well-rounded isn’t a bad thing while job hunting. Some of the people I follow: Nan Palmero (a Blackberry Power User and marketing junkie), Kristen Doyle (a freelance writer but more importantly a woman with a cult-like following of Moms around the country) and Peter Shankman (the creator of Help a Reporter Out-HARO).
2. Avoid wasting the time of others who show you the respect of “following you around”. There’s nothing worse than having someone who links their Twitter account to their Facebook account and chooses to share a little too much. You likely know examples of these people – the ones who tell you that they’re having coffee, and now they’re relaxing, and now they’re thinking about what to eat for lunch, etc.
Tags: 9%, @gameplanhayden, @nanpalmero, dineanddish, facebook, gameplan marketing, get a job, HARO, help a reporter out, how to use social media to get hired, jeremy toeman, kristen doyle, land a job, live digitally, nan palmero, peter shankman, sales by 5, skydiver, social media, social networking, tim hayden, Twitter, unemployment, unemployment rate
Chris Brogan, one of the predominant bloggers in the world of social media and networking, had a guest blogger earlier this week named Teresa Wu.
It’s an interesting following up to my guest entry review of Penelope Trunk’s blog about Generation Y and the new ways to manage them. You can read my review and get a link to Penelope’s blog here.
What I enjoyed most about Ms. Wu’s post was the sincerity that you see when you get to read a first hand description of someone who is actually living in the moment. Her high points:
1. We crave personal development
2. We pursue unconventional paths
3. We value company culture
4. We’re not afraid to ask
5. We embrace transparency
6. We just want to do what we love
It’s worth a read. Enjoy.